Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Power Geyser
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was the Vfd was withdrawn after evidence was presented of the article's truthfulness and notability. Jersyko talk 19:21, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
Not notable, possible hoax. A google search for "operation power geyser" returns only one hit. The article should be deleted, unless there is evidence that the article's content is true. Jersyko talk 15:23, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Not a hoax on my part. The name appeared on the front page of the Washington Post, I then entered into my Vast Database of operational codenames. It is in my book on the subject. If someone hoaxed me, I would be pleased to corrected. Also, I only entered this stub as the name appears in someon else's article I was looking at today. (Darn if I can remember it though! Let me look!) Paul, in Saudi 16:08, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Now I remember, the name appeared a red link on the List of operations and projects (military and non-military) article. I was doing some cleaning and posted the information from the Vast Database. To say that more clearly, someone else posted the name and I just turned the link blue. Paul, in Saudi 16:13, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- New York Times, January 23, 2005, "In Terror Fight, Domestic Roles for U.S. Troops" by Eric Schmitt --Tabor 18:31, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Arkin, William. (2005). Code Names : Deciphering U.S. Military Plans, Programs and Operations in the 9/11 World. Hanover, N.H. : Steerforth Press. ISBN 1586420836 --Tabor 18:36, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.